Some thoughts for consideration…
Fairy tales are a slippery genre to define – the borders of definition are made of seaweed rather than coral, with different characteristics drifting in or out?
Instead of saying that for a story to be a fairy tale, it must have ‘x’ characteristics, it can be more useful to look at a range of characteristics and then measure any given story against them to determine to what extent it is a fairy tale.
We can start by broadly defining genres by saying that
- MYTHS are cosmic, describing origins and creations of various kinds.
- LEGENDS are local, starting with specific places and times, with plausible situations that might have happened, but are now expressed as larger-than-life victories, betrayals, and defeats.
- FAIRY TALES are individual following the lives of character archetypes that can represent aspects of humanity. They work as a psychological codes telling eternal truths about human nature in dream imagery – truthful rather than realistic.
- FOLK TALES can be distinguished from fairy tales, because the one essential of fairy tales is that they must contain something magical or supernatural, often involving some sort of transformation, whereas folk tales have started with a realistic anecdote or joke.
But when we get into specific stories, it can be trickier.
- The Pied Piper of Hamelin happened in Hamelin, As there’s a statue there linking it to a historic event, it’s definitely a legend… except it has magical elements, thereby making it a fairy tale.
- Little Red Riding Hood has no magic at all, so it’s simply a talking animal story… but the world acclaims it as a fairy tale because the transformation is psychological, not magical.
- Bamboo Cutter’s Daughter has a magically-born child found by a childless couple. As she ends up being taken up to heaven with other Chinese gods, is it a myth or a fairy tale?
- As the purpose of a fairy tale is to unite that which is divided to reach a satisfying (psychological) cohesion, fairy tales ‘should’ end with a Happy Ever After… but nearly all of Hans Christian Andersen’s and Oscar Wilde’s fairy tales have bittersweet endings.
If we assembled common fairy tale characteristics, there would be some that are more central:
- Magical transformations
- Archetypal characters
- Third person narrative
- Non-specific time
- Vanquishing evil
- Achieving power
Plus other characteristics that are less essential but very common:
- Coming of age
- Finding a home
- Union of Masculine and Feminine in marriage
- Non-human characters
- Happy endings.
Any of these characteristics may or may not be present in any given story, like a Venn diagram, so when we examine any story against those criteria, we can say that it is a fairy tale to such a degree, or in such a way, but not in others.
From these ingredients, we can have an infinite number of variations or patterns within all the fairy tales in the world, as well as the many stories that sit in the liminal space between fairy tale and myth, or legend, or animal story.
Then again, lots of people just get it wrong. Alice in Wonderland is a fantasy novel. Robin Hood is a legend. Three Billy Goats Gruff is an animal story. Bloggers including them in lists of fairy tales doesn’t make them fairy tales.
It’s equally wrong to think that real fairy tales must be European. Yes, it’s a European art form, starting with Straparola and Basile in Italy, and being named and published by the French Salonnieres in the 1690s – but just because it started there doesn’t mean it ends there. After all, many of our families started in Europe too, but that doesn’t stop us from evolving into our own (multi-) culture. So we can look at stories in India or Peru or Zimbabwe and say to what extent they can be called fairy tales too.
And … we can continue to create new fairy tales – new magical tales of Once Upon A TIme and Happily Ever After – right here and now.
We can also continue to discuss and debate just what a fairy tale is. This is just to get the conversation rolling!
Jo Henwood





































